AI is now not only too big to fail, it’s too big to be constrained by patent and copyright rules and laws and ownership and attribution.
It’s somewhat like ‘eminent domain’ being used to take your real-property and evict you from your own home without compensation.
-
There were laws and rules governing use of someone else’s original written materials. This was bounded by the “fair use” rules that limited the amount of ‘direct quoted’ material one could use.
-
Fast forward to today’s AI ‘no rules, no limits, no bounds’ on what the AI ‘people’ are taking even without credits or footnotes --- just copy it and use it.
This ‘taking’ involves massive volumes targeting the library of congress, the files of the patent office, technical manuals, product specs, the universities dissertations and textbooks just for starters.
-
To add insult to injury AI companies are claiming “Fair Use” applies.
-
When did the CopyRight rules get changed, who changed them and where is all this documented?
-
Perhaps our race with the Chinese for AI dominance will override all the existing rules and laws in the ‘best interests of the country’ and be at the expense of those who originated and owned all this intellectual property!
But what will be the impacts on future invention and disclosure?
-
-
Copyright Law And Southern Virginia and Old 97;
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2023/08/copyright-law-and-southern-virginia.html
-
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2016/10/old-97-rough-road-from-lynchburg-to_24.html
-
-
-
Copyright Law And Southern Virginia and Old 97;
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2023/08/copyright-law-and-southern-virginia.html
-
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2016/10/old-97-rough-road-from-lynchburg-to_24.html
-