-
The NYT and other media pronounced last week that the AMA had issued new guidance that sex-change surgeries for youths should be delayed to legal adulthood ie: 18.
-
Apparently, those so called “physicians” that feed off sexually mutilating children went ballistic claiming that the AMA had Not changed their policy that child sex mutilation is OK as long as an AMA doctor is making money doing it!
-
Example of exchanges:
American Medical Association Says NYT Mischaracterized Its Position on Gender-Affirming Care
https://www.them.us/story/american-medical-association-says-nyt-mischaracterized-its-position-on-gender-affirming-care
Representatives for the Times, in turn, responded to Aizuss on Friday, claiming that his newsletter was “not based in fact” and “contradicts the AMA’s own statements.” Prior to the February article, an AMA spokesperson allegedly said in a statement that “[i]n the absence of clear evidence, the AMA agrees with ASPS that surgical interventions in minors should be generally deferred to adulthood.” The Times concluded that “no update or correction to either [article] is necessary.”
-
Back to Shakespeare – To Cut or Not To Cut – that is the sick question!
-
-
Child Sex Mutilation Not OK!
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2025/06/child-sex-mutilation-not-ok.html
-
Biden’s US TaxPayer Funded Child Sex Mutilation
How could sex mutilation of children who have not reached the age of puberty or consent be ‘legally’ conducted in the United States in 2022?
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2022/04/bidens-us-taxpayer-funded-child-sex.html
-
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2023/03/bidens-child-sex-mutilation-stance-sick.html
-
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2022/11/biden-promoting-sexual-mutilation-of.html
-