-
Watching
the changing outputs, of the Corona-19 Models, has been a reflection for many who have been involved in modeling and simulations in the past.
-
This
modeling effort is somewhat reflective of the 102 AGW Global Temperature Models
and their ongoing validity issues.
-
Two long
term modeling truths:
Garbage In
Results in Garbage Out
Real Data
Always Aces Models
-
-
The Initial
Corona-19 model outputs for the US
gave a range of 1.5-Million to 2.2-Million deaths.
“The
coordinator of Trump’s coronavirus task force, Deborah Birx, then projected a
slide with a high-arcing mountain showing the worst-case scenario: 1.5 million
to 2.2 million deaths if Americans and the government did absolutely nothing to
stop the virus. And a smaller — but still imposing — hill with 100,000 to
240,000 deaths if measures such as social distancing are taken.
Birx said
the projection was based on five or six modelers, including from Imperial College
in Britain and Harvard, Columbia and Northeastern
universities.”
-
Fauci (Apr
9) Says U.S.
Coronavirus Deaths May Be 'More Like 60,000';
Fortunately
most American People are taking this pandemic seriously and complying with
health official’s directions combined with high levels of quality care, the final
death rate may be below the 100K level depending on the so called end date.
-
The CoronaVirus
modelers are acting professionally and are adjusting their models with Reality
Data Feedback.
-
The
AGW-Temp modelers refuse to adjust their models to Reality Data and simply let
the massive disconnect between their models and reality stand for all to see.
(Albeit
that there are none so blind as those who will not see)
-
Ave of 102 AGW-Temp
Models are 4-Times the Reality-Temperatures
-
-
Apparently
there is no limit to their arrogance.
-