Pages

▼

Thursday, March 14, 2024

What Climate Change?

-
The challenge to ‘The Gore-Kerry-Greta Orthodoxy’ in the referenced article has been encompassed in this blog since 2005:
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2005/02/kyoto-treaty.html
The contrarian premise being that CO2 impacts are secondary compared to the major impacts from the InterGlacial we have been in since 1750.
No article on global warming should be published without specifically articulating the impacts of our current InterGlacial and the repetitious nature and impacts of earths past InterGlacial’s. This is Not rocket science!
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2021/11/glaciers-are-and-have-been-disappearing.html
-
-
-
Scientists Expose Major Problems With Climate Change Data
‘Climate activism has become the new religion of the 21st century—heretics are not welcome and not allowed to ask questions,’ said astrophysicist Willie Soon.
Scientists Expose Major Problems With Climate Change Data | The Epoch Times
-
Temperature records used by climate scientists and governments to build models that then forecast dangerous manmade global warming repercussions have serious problems and even corruption in the data, multiple scientists who have published recent studies on the issue told The Epoch Times.
-
Problems with temperature data include a lack of geographically and historically representative data, contamination of the records by heat from urban areas, and corruption of the data introduced by a process known as “homogenization.”
-
The flaws are so significant that they make the temperature data—and the models based on it—essentially useless or worse, three independent scientists with the Center for Environmental Research and Earth Sciences (CERES) explained.
-
The experts said that when data corruption is considered, the alleged “climate crisis” supposedly caused by human activities disappears.
Instead, natural climate variability offers a much better explanation for what is being observed, they said.
-
-
-
WSJ: ‘Follow the Science’ Leads to Ruin

Climate policy needs to take into account the costs of draconian measures, which are enormous.
‘Follow the Science’ Leads to Ruin - WSJ
Careful science can inform us about the problem of climate change, but it can’t tell us how to solve it. Sensible public debate requires all the facts, including about the costs of our choices. Some of the most popular climate policies will have costs far greater than climate change itself.
When politicians try to shut down discussion with claims that they’re “following the science,” don’t let them.
-
-
-
ESG Climate Reality

at