The RoanokeSlant

This file is a US personal journal of commentary of examples of the Roanoke Times and Liberal Media Slant...... lbhagen@aol.com

Thursday, July 17, 2014

Perspective On Carbon Restrictions

Roanoke Times, 7-17-2014, Pg 15: Perspective On Carbon Restrictions

Brian Lindholm: is a mechanical engineer who lives in Roanoke.
-
-

Last month, the EPA proposed major new regulations to restrict carbon emissions from power plants. The aim of these rules is to reduce the harmful effects of anthropic global warming. Some people claim that it will outlaw coal and make electricity more expensive, while others claim that the program will work smoothly while lowering people’s power bills.

After all, the cap-and-trade program of 1990 that regulated sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions worked well. Plants continued to operate while pollution was controlled. The subject of acid rain gradually dropped out of the news. Cannot carbon restrictions work the same way?

Unfortunately, no. SO2 is a “trace” pollutant emitted from a coal-fired plant, typically measured at 1500 parts per million (ppm). A modern scrubber can reduce this value by more than 90 percent. Unfortunately, the “scrubbed” sulfur doesn’t simply disappear. By conservation of mass, we know that it must go somewhere, and that somewhere is the ash-retention ponds that we know and loathe. Once dried, the sulfur-bearing ash is sold for cement or reburied in empty mines.

In addition to ash-retention ponds, it must be noted that scrubbers are expensive to install and power-intensive to run. Enough to reduce power plant output by a full percentage point. This was the source of resistance to the sulfur cap-and-trade program. Ultimately, though, if a coal-fired station had to operate to meet electricity demand, there was a way to make it happen: Add scrubbers.

It’s fundamentally different with carbon dioxide. CO2 is a primary combustion product and is typically measured in the exhaust stream at 150,000 ppm. Conventional scrubbers won’t touch it; new carbon capture and sequestration, or CCS, technology is required. Unfortunately, proposed technologies are power-intensive enough to reduce power plant output by 20-plus percentage points. And again, the captured CO2 doesn’t simply disappear. It must go somewhere. And in this case, massive volumes of CO2 would be moved via high-pressure pipeline to sequestration sites, to be injected deep underground into geologic formations suitable for long-term retention.

Could we ever build such pipelines? If the Keystone XL pipeline is any indication, the answer is no. Many people fear the possibility of pipeline accidents spreading crude oil over the land, and we’ve gone five years without a decision. Imagine the uproar when people learn that proposed pipelines in their area would be filled with an invisible, ground-hugging asphyxiant.

Given the extreme costs of extracting CO2 from the exhaust stream of a coal-fired station and the near-certain political impossibility of piping it for sequestration, CCS won’t happen. As a result, if a coal-fired station is needed to meet electricity demand but would push CO2 emissions over the limit, it would not be permitted to run. A partial shutdown of our coal-fired fleet seems inevitable.

How do we keep the lights on, then? The decommissioned coal-fired stations would have to be replaced with alternatives, such as gas-fired stations, nuclear, or renewables (hydro, wind and solar). Replacing 60 percent of our coal-fired fleet with gas-fired stations (which generate half as much CO2 per kWh) would meet the 2030 goal of a 30 percent reduction from a 2005 baseline. Or alternatively, if the replacements were done with nuclear and/or renewables, only 30 percent of the coal-fired fleet would require replacement. Or we might do a mix.

Fortunately, “fracking” has driven natural gas prices down substantially in recent years (getting us halfway to the 30 percent reduction goal even without carbon regulations), but early field depletion or an environmentalist-led legal crackdown may send prices soaring again.

Regardless of the final mix, though, these carbon rules would constitute a major disruption to the power generation business. In 2012, coal-fired stations generated 1.23 trillion kilowatt-hours of electricity worth more than $150 billion. That’s a full percentage point of GDP, produced using equipment costing many times that amount. Replacing it won’t be cheap. And if we push too hard on renewables, we risk making the same errors that Germany and Denmark have made, where electricity prices have been driven to 36 cents and 40 cents per kWh, respectively. In comparison, AEP charges less than 13 cents per kWh.

Is such cost and disruption really necessary? Well, that depends on how bad AGW will actually be. Frustratingly, the climate simulations used by the IPCC and other climate researchers continue to yield wildly varying results. If the pessimistic simulations are true, then this effort is too little, too late. If the optimistic are true, then it’s pain without purpose. Only if the middle band is correct will the expense be worth it.

-
End of Lindholm Article
-
-
11:15am EST today 7-16-2014: The Australian Senate passes the CARBON TAX REPEAL BILL.
-

“

Australia

has become the first country in the world to abolish a price on carbon, with the Senate passing the Abbott government’s repeal bills 39 votes to 32.
The Australian Senate passes the CARBON REPEAL bill.
http://joannenova.com.au/2014/07/carbon-tax-gone-australia-first-country-to-get-rid-of-a-price-on-carbon/
-
Heartland Institute conference shows the growing power of climate realism
http://washingtonexaminer.com/heartland-institute-conference-shows-the-growing-power-of-climate-realism/article/2550882
-

Click for RoanokeSlant PowerPoint realistic view of Global Warming and Climate Change
http://www.roanokeslant.org/AGW-Skeptic2D/
-
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2014/01/global-warming-meets-mother-nature.html
-
http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2013/03/abusing-science-with-executive-power.html
-

posted by Lars Hagen # 1:40 PM

<< Home

Archives

February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 January 2021 February 2021 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 November 2021 December 2021 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 August 2022 September 2022 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022 January 2023 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 May 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024