The RoanokeSlant

This file is a US personal journal of commentary of examples of the Roanoke Times and Liberal Media Slant...... lbhagen@aol.com

Tuesday, May 08, 2018

WSJ: The Two Rod Rosensteins

Limiting Congress but letting the special counsel do pretty much what he pleases.

WSJ: By William McGurn May 7, 2018 6:24 p.m. ET

In federal court last Friday, Robert Mueller’s prosecutors claimed it was no big deal if they didn’t abide by the Justice Department’s own regulations in their prosecution of former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort. Before a manifestly skeptical judge, they argued their real authority to do what they did is rooted in (secret) “discussions” with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

Three days earlier, Mr. Rosenstein had himself taken a distinctly different approach when the authority in question belonged to Congress. When asked about nascent efforts to impeach him because of dissatisfaction with the way he has responded to congressional subpoenas, Mr. Rosenstein’s choice of words was arresting. “The Department of Justice,” he said, “is not going to be extorted."

Meet the two Rod Rosensteins.

The first Rod Rosenstein, who oversees the special counsel, seems to have signed off on everything Mr. Mueller has done, from his choice of a prosecutorial team devoid of any Trump supporter to the expansion of Mr. Mueller’s authority well beyond his public mandate. The president may bellow about witch hunts, and federal Judge T.S. Ellis may complain that no special counsel should have “unfettered power,” but if Mr. Rosenstein believes there are limits on what Mr. Mueller can do, he isn’t letting on.

By contrast, Mr. Rosenstein has been less than accommodating in signing off on documents Congress has demanded. The documents are essential to informing lawmakers about what went on in the 2016 presidential election. Today Congress is rightly frustrated, at not only the pace of production but also the heavy redactions.

This is why congressional requests for documents have turned into subpoenas, and why subpoenas are now turning into calls to hold Mr. Rosenstein in contempt or impeach him. At stake is the ability of Congress to fulfill its oversight responsibility.

The transcript from Friday’s oral argument in Judge Ellis’s courtroom illuminates another area of Mr. Rosenstein’s contributions to accountability. Specifically, the judge was dealing with a motion from Mr. Manafort contending that the bank- and tax-fraud charges lodged against him are illegitimate because they a) had nothing to do with the 2016 election and b) didn’t “arise” from the Russia-collusion investigation (the charges originated in an earlier and separate Justice investigation picked up by the special counsel).

The big question—which Judge Ellis also raised—is whether “the special prosecutor has unlimited powers to do anything he or she wants.”

In theory Mr. Mueller’s powers are limited in two ways: He reports to Mr. Rosenstein, and he operates under two 2017 Rosenstein memos (of May 17 and Aug. 2) authorizing and clarifying his investigation. It isn’t clear, however, that Mr. Rosenstein has in fact imposed any limits. And Mr. Mueller’s own team told Judge Ellis they don’t consider themselves limited by the two Rosenstein memos.

David Rivkin, a constitutional lawyer who has served in the Justice Department and the White House Counsel’s Office, says what matters isn’t whether Mr. Mueller technically reports to the Justice Department but whether he actually operates under any real limits. “A special counsel with unlimited jurisdiction, who cannot be removed but for ‘cause’ and isn’t effectively supervised by an attorney general, is completely unaccountable and therefore constitutionally unacceptable,” he says.

In his courtroom, Judge Ellis characterized the Mueller team’s claims about the initial Rosenstein letter authorizing the special counsel investigation this way: “We said this is what the investigation was about. But we’re not going to be bound by it, and we weren’t really telling the truth in that May 17 letter.”

Ditto for the argument that Justice can defy a lawful congressional subpoena if the release of documents might compromise a criminal investigation. Certainly Congress should not seek to wreck a criminal investigation, and should be open to acceptable compromises. But Congress shouldn’t let the mere fact of a criminal investigation lead it to step aside and shirk its core constitutional responsibility: holding the government accountable to the people.

Impeachment is a perfectly appropriate means to this end, which is why the Constitution provides for it. True, the last appointed federal executive impeached by Congress was a cabinet member in the administration of Ulysses S. Grant. But Congress impeached a judge as recently as 2010, and there are no constitutional exemptions for deputy attorneys general.

The bar for impeachment is set high, and for good reason. The process requires Congress to act as a coequal branch of government, which means acting collectively as a body. If Congress ever does hold an impeachment vote to express its displeasure with Mr. Rosenstein’s actions, Republican and Democratic members alike will have to calculate the risks knowing that, however they voted, the American people would judge them by their decision.

Which would be more political accountability than we’ve seen since the Russia-collusion investigation started.

Obama-DOJ-Persecutors: First McDonnell Now Trump

http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2018/05/obama-doj-persecutors-first-mcdonnell.html

Why the Justice Department Is Defiant

http://roanokeslant.blogspot.com/2018/05/why-justice-department-is-defiant.html

posted by Lars Hagen # 9:00 AM

<< Home

Archives

February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 September 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 January 2021 February 2021 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 November 2021 December 2021 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 August 2022 September 2022 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022 January 2023 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 May 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 August 2024 September 2024 October 2024 November 2024 December 2024