The RoanokeSlant

This file is a personal journal of commentary of examples of the Roanoke Times and Liberal Media Slant.

Friday, September 16, 2016


Setting The Climate Record Straight – Theory vs. Reality

Kudos to the Editors of the Roanoke Times for publishing this article in both their paper and website.
Weismantel: Setting the climate record straight
Posted: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:00 am
Steve Weismantel is a retired engineer, with a specialty in thermodynamics, heat transfer, and 2-phase fluid dynamics, all of which are important fundamentals of climate dynamics. He lives in Moneta, Va.
The science of climate is relatively new with many unknowns. What we know for certain is that the climate has always been changing. Climate mechanisms are highly complex, intertwined and take many years for changes to manifest. Because of this, it is very difficult to test and validate climate theories. As a result, scientists have resorted to computer models to test their theories … but more on this later.
Many scary scenarios have described the purported consequences of so-called man-made global warming (aka climate change) which is supposedly caused by the burning of fossil fuels and their CO2 emissions. The government has relentlessly used its many resources to push the CO2-causal theory, including nongovernmental entities who are vested in any climate crisis. Still, polling of the general 
public continues to put climate at the bottom of today’s problems. In an attempt to move opinion, the alarmists’ prognostications have become more frequent and shrill.
The historic record, however, contradicts the CO2 theory and “sky will be falling” predictions. A few examples:
Compared to today, the earth was actually much warmer during Roman and Medieval times (when atmospheric CO2 was at historic lows). After all, Greenland got its name when the Vikings initially settled there around 980 AD and much of the land was … green.
The Vikings left Greenland around 1350 AD when global temperatures got frigid during a prolonged period called “The Little Ice Age,” which ended in the mid-1800s. The earth has been warming ever since, which has naturally caused sea levels to slowly rise at the same rate as today. During this entire time CO2 remained unchanged when global temperatures went up, then down and then up again. Even during post-World War II economic development, when CO2 began its recent rise, its concentration remained fairly low at 0.04 percent, still a very small part of the atmosphere.
More frequent and severe storms than today were recorded in the 1930s-1950s when CO2 levels were still low. And, while the Arctic ice cap had been shrinking, it hasn’t disappeared (as Al Gore had predicted it would by 2015). Now the rate of Arctic ice loss has slowed. In fact, the combined ice in the Arctic and Antarctic has actually been increasing for over 35 years.
But, the greatest fallacy in the warnings of impending climate doom is that the predictions are based on computer programs that have greatly exaggerated the future rise in temperature. Truth is, accurate measurements from satellites and weather balloons show earth’s warming has actually paused for about 18 years, even as CO2 continues to increase.
According to the government’s climate models, today’s global temperature average should have been much higher than it actually is. Going forward, the government’s high projections diverge further and further from the actual trend of lower temperatures.
In fact, the latest research is now showing the variation in the earth’s cloud cover to be the greatest driver of global warming (or cooling), and that CO2 has very little effect, if any. These significant conclusions are mostly ignored by the media and the alarmists, probably because it doesn’t fit with today’s “green” environmentalism narrative.
The fact that the climate modeling is wrong has wide ramification. Since the models’ single purpose was to validate the CO2-causal theory, then the theory itself must be wrong. Further, since the temperature assumption drives all scenarios, from ice melt to sea rise to droughts, the scenarios themselves must also be exaggerated because they were based on the faulty over-estimation of temperature.
This is actually very good news because, with the current real temperature trend, we will not experience the diseases and other calamities the alarmists claim when using the exceedingly high temperatures calculated by their faulty computer models. And, we won’t then need to scrap a proven, reliable and relatively cheap form of electricity production (fossil fuels). Unfortunately, good news doesn’t sell very well, and so it goes unreported — if not ignored — and thus, unrecognized.
Hopefully we’ll soon wake up to reality, before our fragile economy and standard of living is sacrificed, with the poor suffering the most, all based on a false theory.
Prior blog item:
Pathetic Weather And Climate Modeling And Outlandish Predictions


Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   May 2010   June 2010   July 2010   August 2010   September 2010   October 2010   November 2010   December 2010   January 2011   February 2011   March 2011   April 2011   May 2011   June 2011   July 2011   August 2011   September 2011   October 2011   November 2011   December 2011   January 2012   February 2012   March 2012   April 2012   May 2012   June 2012   July 2012   August 2012   September 2012   October 2012   November 2012   December 2012   January 2013   February 2013   March 2013   April 2013   May 2013   June 2013   July 2013   August 2013   September 2013   October 2013   November 2013   December 2013   January 2014   February 2014   March 2014   April 2014   May 2014   June 2014   July 2014   August 2014   September 2014   October 2014   November 2014   December 2014   January 2015   February 2015   March 2015   April 2015   May 2015   June 2015   July 2015   August 2015   September 2015   October 2015   November 2015   December 2015   January 2016   February 2016   March 2016   April 2016   May 2016   June 2016   July 2016   August 2016   September 2016   October 2016   November 2016   December 2016   January 2017   February 2017   March 2017  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?